> Trains, my friend. We need trains. Busses first, but eventually trains. For that, we first need density. And who is against more density in existing cities

> Trains, my friend. We need trains. Busses first, but eventually trains. For that, we first need density. And who is against more density in existing cities where naturally more density makes most sense? More or less the same people arguing against cars. https://sfstandard.com/opinion/2024/03/25/letting-aaron-peskin-pass-another-anti-housing-law-would-be-a-slap-in-the-face-for-sf/ https://sfstandard.com/opinion/2024/03/25/letting-aaron-pesk... https://www.kqed.org/news/11964754/sf-supervisors-to-vote-on-permanent-car-ban-for-stretch-of-shelley-drive-in-mclaren-park https://www.kqed.org/news/11964754/sf-supervisors-to-vote-on... https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/housing/sf-permitting-paltry-number-of-new-homes-federal-data-shows/article_f6883b26-0aed-11ee-a064-2f680cffa28d.html https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/housing/sf-permitting-paltry... https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/sf-drivers-say-war-on-cars-vs-safe-streets-19451511.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/sf-drivers-say-war-on...