Respectfully, you should be arguing for more density so you don't even have to travel by rail that much. But any density is opposed strangely by the anti-car c

Respectfully, you should be arguing for more density so you don't even have to travel by rail that much. But any density is opposed strangely by the anti-car crowd due to (e.g., see SF local politics). 1. "It will ruin the character of our precious million year old city" 2. "Building more housing will magically cause existing people to move out the city" 3. "Developers will get rich. Can't ever let that happen. They should be in perpetual misery." If someone is advocating for anti-car policies but neutral or against density, they are holding inconsistent views.