> do anything under the slogan of "protecting the children". This is far too forgiving a representation, they are surveillance wolves disingenuously wearing th

> do anything under the slogan of "protecting the children". This is far too forgiving a representation, they are surveillance wolves disingenuously wearing the sheeps' wool of protecting children to further their eventual thought-policing goals of "total information awareness." Doing anything to protect children is difficult to object to. Using the children as their pretense for monitoring dissidents is really the heart of the matter. It's important to differentiate between the two. I get that this difference could be subtly implicit in that comment, but let's please make it explicit.