Which direction are you looking for? Ones where GPT-4o does better or ones where Opus does better? Assuming the former, here's an example I had yesterday wher

Which direction are you looking for? Ones where GPT-4o does better or ones where Opus does better? Assuming the former, here's an example I had yesterday where Opus was never able to formulate a correct response even with multiple follow-ups but GPT-4o got it with only two follow ups: > I have a postgres database with a table called projects. On that table is a column called designs that is of json type and is nullable as well as a column called id that is of type text. The data in the designs column will be an array of objects (assuming it's not null). Each object in the array will have a field called price that will be a string. Most of these prices will be in the format $#,### where # is a number. However some will be in the format # ### US$. This second format where the numbers are separated by spaces instead of commas and the dollar sign appears at the end of the string instead of the beginning with an extraneous US is incorrect. What SQL can I run to migrate all prices that are incorrectly formatted to the correct format? Alternatively, this is a non-tech related one that GPT-4 gets correct that no other model does: > In 388 BC, the boxer Eupolus of Thessaly defeated three opponents at the ancient Olympics. Funded by the men involved, several bronze statues of Zeus were erected, with inscriptions detailing the events. Why did the four men prefer not to have the statues around? I like that one because Opus will tell you that you're wrong and mistaken, which is pretty funny while GPT-4 answer correctly with the actual context.