4 ms·
You're describing an approach to implementing AR. Simple test: can you get a drink out of the fridge while wearing the headset? If the answer is yes, it's AR.
by samatman 2y ago
You're describing an approach to implementing AR.
Simple test: can you get a drink out of the fridge while wearing the headset?
If the answer is yes, it's AR.
- wtallis 2y agoThe definitions of these terms are certainly not fixed or universally agreed-upon, but on the spectrum from VR to MR to AR, the Vision Pro is definitely not at the AR end of things, and is very much not the class of device that the term "AR glasses" refers to. The problems that "AR glasses" have with operating outside in full daylight are inherent to a class of devices that does not include the Vision Pro. To the extent that the Vision Pro works better outdoors than whatever "AR glasses" OP had in mind, it's because the Vision Pro is a fundamentally different kind of device with wildly different tradeoffs and design goals.
- samatman 2y agoSo to summarize: unlike other AR glasses, it isn't unusable in sunlight, because it uses cameras to provide augmented reality, rather than something else. Got it.
- crazygringo 2y agoWhy "other" AR glasses? AVP is not glasses. It's a headset. Headsets and glasses are two entirely different product categories.
- samatman 2y agoBecause a refusal to understand what someone means when it's obvious, doesn't (as the delusion would have it) make that person look intelligent or win them imaginary internet points. It's just annoying.