3 ms·

I wonder why TechCrunch doesn't link to their (own?) Crunchbase info about the company [1] to analyze the history of the company further. Also Yahoo Finance [2]

by wslh 2y ago

I wonder why TechCrunch doesn't link to their (own?) Crunchbase info about the company [1] to analyze the history of the company further. Also Yahoo Finance [2] gives more context beyond the bankruptcy. Saying this because I was not following the company and many times quantitative information gives you a quick insight. [1] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/fisker https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/fisker [2] https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/FSRN/ https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/FSRN/

JumpCrisscross 2y ago
> many times quantitative information gives you a quick insight Did you happen to find one with these data?
- wslh 2y ago
  I don't know if a confussion arised? There is quantitative information available because the company is public.
  - JumpCrisscross 2y ago
    I asked if those data lead you to any insights. I wasn’t able to find anything compelling that the title, noting the company’s collapse, didn’t convey more concisely. More data absent insights just lowers the SNR.
    - wslh 2y ago
      I said that there is more quantitative data. It is not noise because it is data about a public company. I see in your profile that you know about what we are talking about so I assume you can go to places like [1]. [1] https://investors.fiskerinc.com/financials/quarterly-results/default.aspx#:~:text=Fisker%20reports%20preliminary%20Q4%202023,be%20recognized%20in%20future%20periods https://investors.fiskerinc.com/financials/quarterly-results....
      - JumpCrisscross 2y ago
        > is not noise because it is data about a public company That’s noise absent insights. It contributes nothing to the article, and was properly left out. If this were a story about Fisker’s stock price it would be germane, but from a glance that doesn’t seem to be where the signal is. The team and operations are. (It’s not on the brink of collapse, either. It’s collapsed. As communicated by the title.)

by wslh 2y ago

JumpCrisscross 2y ago

> many times quantitative information gives you a quick insight Did you happen to find one with these data?

wslh 2y ago
I don't know if a confussion arised? There is quantitative information available because the company is public.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago
  I asked if those data lead you to any insights. I wasn’t able to find anything compelling that the title, noting the company’s collapse, didn’t convey more concisely. More data absent insights just lowers the SNR.
  - wslh 2y ago
    I said that there is more quantitative data. It is not noise because it is data about a public company. I see in your profile that you know about what we are talking about so I assume you can go to places like [1]. [1] https://investors.fiskerinc.com/financials/quarterly-results/default.aspx#:~:text=Fisker%20reports%20preliminary%20Q4%202023,be%20recognized%20in%20future%20periods https://investors.fiskerinc.com/financials/quarterly-results....
    - JumpCrisscross 2y ago
      > is not noise because it is data about a public company That’s noise absent insights. It contributes nothing to the article, and was properly left out. If this were a story about Fisker’s stock price it would be germane, but from a glance that doesn’t seem to be where the signal is. The team and operations are. (It’s not on the brink of collapse, either. It’s collapsed. As communicated by the title.)