3 ms·
It's easy to hit the downvote button. It'd show more courage and intelligence to counter with an actual argument. Incidentally, Wikipedia backs my definition o
by wissler 14y ago
It's easy to hit the downvote button. It'd show more courage and intelligence to counter with an actual argument.
Incidentally, Wikipedia backs my definition of "cold":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_war_(general_term) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_war_(general_term)
"A cold war or cold warfare is a state of conflict between nations that does not involve direct military action but is pursued primarily through economic and political actions, propaganda, acts of espionage or proxy wars waged by surrogates. The surrogates are typically states that are "satellites" of the conflicting nations, i.e., nations allied to them or under their political influence. Opponents in a cold war will often provide economic or military aid, such as weapons, tactical support or military advisors, to lesser nations involved in conflicts with the opposing country."
I.e., this definition does not include direct planned and executed attacks by the nations involved. Continuing:
"The definition which has now become fixed is of a war waged through indirect conflict."
Indirect means indirect, not directly planting viruses that can destroy your factory.
- pyre 14y ago> acts of espionage Are you claiming that stuxnet is not an act of espionage? > Indirect means indirect By your definition, embargoes are 'direct' because they are not levied against proxy nations.
- wissler 14y agoStuxnet was very clearly sabotage. I can't believe the herd here. Downvote away.