3 ms·
https://archive.is/R5zkq https://archive.is/R5zkq It is relevant to point out that NYT is engaged in a legal battle with OpenAI. This article refers to "AIs l
by gardnr 2y ago
https://archive.is/R5zkq https://archive.is/R5zkq
It is relevant to point out that NYT is engaged in a legal battle with OpenAI.
This article refers to "AIs like ChatGPT" which clearly shows who it is targeted at. For people thay don't read arxiv every day, the actual advancements are difficult to sift out of all the hype.
The dilution of the meaning of AI will contribute to the bubble's contraction when the general public realises that "AI" doesn't mean anything specific and definitely doesn't mean what they have in their imaginations.
Regardless of where we are today, it is undoubtedly worth the effort to continue the research. This hype cycle has kick started a lot of ideas that will benefit humanity. We still do have that pesky problem of corporations innovating while simultaneously ruining everything.
- mastazi 2y ago> It is relevant to point out that NYT is engaged in a legal battle with OpenAI. The article is from WSJ