4 ms·
> That white men in particular have a hard time dealing with a more level playing field is pathetic. All men want is a level playing field. Colleges have been
by pseudo0 2y ago
> That white men in particular have a hard time dealing with a more level playing field is pathetic.
All men want is a level playing field. Colleges have been discriminating against white and Asian men for decades. SCOTUS finally slapped them down, and colleges immediately started scheming to find ways to be covertly racist through proxies for race. Many colleges stopped using SAT scores, making admissions more subjective, and easier to influence with racial bias. Workplaces are doing the same thing, with DEI hiring goals that in effect mean "no white or Asian men".
Have you considered that your experience as a boomer is not representative of conditions for millennials and zoomers today?
- MaysonL 2y agoAll men want is a level playing field, a few steps higher than the level playing field women play on. (Which they had up until not very long ago, and still have to a large extent).
- pseudo0 2y agoViewing things through a "battle of the genders" lens like that is toxic. The men getting screwed over today are completely different individuals than the men who benefited from unfair policies or norms in previous generations. You aren't getting revenge by retaliating against young men, just hurting innocent bystanders.
- skhunted 2y agoI’m not a boomer. Born in the 70s. I’m a white a male who teaches in higher education. White men have a more or less equal opportunity in terms of going to college. Until recently college admissions were on the decline and most colleges were way less choosy than in the past. Men are not oppressed. They just aren’t coddled as much as in the past. Men don’t seem to be able to deal with living in a society in which they aren’t privileged. It’s pathetic.
- pseudo0 2y agoAh, right. An early Gen Xer, my mistake. Still, you were part of a generation that actually benefited from sexist norms and policies. Have you considered resigning your position to make room for a more deserving diverse candidate? After all, it's quite possible that you only obtained your position because a woman was unfairly passed over. Sarcasm aside, your performative self-flagellation gives me second-hand embarrassment. The DEI activists at your college will never like you, no matter how much you bash young white men.
- beej71 2y agoI also can't speak for DEI everywhere, but at our school, the focus of DEI is entirely on hiring the most qualified person for the job.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 2y agoThat's fantastic and how it should be everywhere. But that's not what DEI is or how it works. I wish that it did, but its not.
- skhunted 2y agoI don’t like the liberal do gooders in academia. The ones who think they are doing something meaningfully good by putting land acknowledgement statements in their syllabus are equally pathetic. Usually there are a few equally qualified applicants for a given position. The goal is to not carry on the tradition of excluding those on the outside because they don’t “fit” with the current in group.
- beej71 2y agoI'm a Gen-Xer. I teach at a university. My classes are almost entirely white males. But I do admit my anecdotal experience might not be representative.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]