I find it extraordinarily unlikely that the average person's understanding of AI is any different from the man the article is about. The text AI outputs resemb

I find it extraordinarily unlikely that the average person's understanding of AI is any different from the man the article is about. The text AI outputs resembles that of a well-spoken expert on the given subject matter speaking with full confidence and authority. There's nothing to clue the user into the unreliability of the output, so 99% of users will not think to double-check. The chat from the article proves as much: [1]. There's no way a non-techie would doubt this well worded, reasonably sounding answer to a question about Meta from the official Meta chatbot while using the Meta app. [1]: https://i.cbc.ca/1.7219639.1717103895!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_1180/screencapture-from-dave-gaudreau.jpg https://i.cbc.ca/1.7219639.1717103895!/fileImage/httpImage/i...