3 ms·
The entry seems written by someone lacking maturity. The candor in the screencap'd chat conversation is novel, and will probably drive clicks. But in its uned
by bredren 2y ago
The entry seems written by someone lacking maturity.
The candor in the screencap'd chat conversation is novel, and will probably drive clicks.
But in its unedited form serves as dirty laundry, and including the language from the threat actor is both unnecessary and inappropriate.
I can't tell if the threat actor agreeing HR would have potentially helped avert this problem is a good endorsement or not.
On one hand testimony from a threat of a product's effectiveness would be good, but on the other, this is a little up close and personal of an endorsement from someone actively ransoming so many companies and putting so much data at risk.
- wannacboatmovie 2y ago> But in its unedited form serves as dirty laundry, and including the language from the threat actor is both unnecessary and inappropriate. A threat actor has intent to hold a company ransom for $20 million and your first reaction is to feign offense that the word 'retarded' appeared in a chat log? These are not charm school graduates.
- p0seidon 2y ago> The entry seems written by someone lacking maturity. Agree with that.
- ExoticPearTree 2y agoYou saw someone on the internet use a bad word and you felt offended?