> Anderson acknowledged that the idea of a “gun that never misses is controversial,” and the company stepped back from pursuing sales to domestic police forces

> Anderson acknowledged that the idea of a “gun that never misses is controversial,” and the company stepped back from pursuing sales to domestic police forces because, as he put it, “I don’t think the world is ready for that, nor am I for that matter. I don’t want police to have AI weapons.” Is passing on this market something that a16z and other investors would support? This feels a lot like early Google saying "Don't be evil," then Schmidt coming along later and saying "that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard."