> They presented three possible crimes to the jury, but didn't even require them to declare that he had committed any of those crimes The crime he was convicte

> They presented three possible crimes to the jury, but didn't even require them to declare that he had committed any of those crimes The crime he was convicted of requires proof he falsified documents to attempt to commit those other crimes, not that he succeeded. He doesn't have to be guilty of another crime to be guilty of felony record falsification in attempt to commit another crime. And the statute doesn't require the jury to agree on what crime was attempted. That's a finding of fact left to the jury, but each juror may choose which scenario is most likely; you can't play the scenarios off each other as reasonable doubt if at least one of them is what happened in each juror's individual best judgment.