> So why is there no official statement from the ISP? If it was an attack shouldn't there be an investigation? We should assume a decision to make no statement

> So why is there no official statement from the ISP? If it was an attack shouldn't there be an investigation? We should assume a decision to make no statement was based on the outcome of an investigation. I wonder how much of the replacement cost is insured. I am guessing none. Leaving the ISP at severe risk of, er, business discontinuity. Another good reason for no statement.