> Qt again is an independent publicly traded company. Qt was never an independent publicly traded company before. Independent maybe, but not publicly traded. I

> Qt again is an independent publicly traded company. Qt was never an independent publicly traded company before. Independent maybe, but not publicly traded. It was technically publicly traded while being a Nokia asset, but not independent :) Regardless of the name (a Meta by any other name would still stink of Facebook, an Alphabet by any other name would still stink of Google), does their site still look like you'd better hire a lawyer before you touch their intellectual property?