> "security for the 1%." And it makes the rest of us less safe. Actually it seems like the opposite. The chances that the government or other entity with a pu

> "security for the 1%." And it makes the rest of us less safe. Actually it seems like the opposite. The chances that the government or other entity with a purchased exploit is going to hack you is very small. The targets there are the 1%. If instead of being sold on the black market, the exploit is disclosed to the public. Worms can be written, your grandparent's unpatched computer could be taken down, and the overall impact on the average Joe will be much higher.