3 ms·
> That means that somewhere there's a written policy defining where they should and shouldn't be doing these things, and that the policy wasn't strictly observe
by sobkas 2y ago
> That means that somewhere there's a written policy defining where they should and shouldn't be doing these things, and that the policy wasn't strictly observed this time. They weren't just doing this randomly; they had procedures designed, ostensibly, to protect public safety, and the procedures weren't followed. A failure of leadership occurred at multiple levels, but, as is so common these days, nobody will be held accountable. It'll be given lip service and hand wringing, but ultimately nothing will be done.
Procedures are there to look nice in the book, what matters is culture of use. Because culture always wins with procedures.
- observationist 2y agoYup - the "should we be doing this here" and "how and where should we do this" came after the fact, meaning they've probably been flagrantly violating written procedure for a long time; it's only now that they've been caught that the rules matter.