Maybe. But it can also be a good tactical case to set precendent against your opponents. Having the NRA as one of the parties puts the conservative wing of th

Maybe. But it can also be a good tactical case to set precendent against your opponents. Having the NRA as one of the parties puts the conservative wing of the court in a bind. They don't really want to limit this (Republicans like to be authoritarian), but they don't want it used as a cudgel against the NRA, either. So, the progressives get the first amendment issues reaffirmed, and the conservatives have to protect the NRA.