4 ms·
Those cases are about applying these principals to specific events/facts. But what part about what I said do you believe to be undecided? That a human can lea
by paulddraper 2y ago
Those cases are about applying these principals to specific events/facts.
But what part about what I said do you believe to be undecided?
That a human can learn without violating copyright? That a machine can learn without violating copyright?
- hehdhdjehehegwv 2y agoLiterally everything about ML training and IP is undecided.
- paulddraper 2y agoLol thinking those are outside the law
- hehdhdjehehegwv 2y agoThe law is interpreted anew each day. Nothing is outside the law. Perhaps if all rules were written in stone, and clear of ambiguity, we would not need judges or the legal process. But that’s not how any of this works.