3 ms·
As programmers, we spend most of our working time in glorified text editors (I'm using mostly Emacs at the moment, which that is certainly an apt description of
by archangel_one 14y ago
As programmers, we spend most of our working time in glorified text editors (I'm using mostly Emacs at the moment, which that is certainly an apt description of). I guess it's natural to be excited about new alternatives for our primary tool.
- slurgfest 14y agoLight table is a neat concept but there is a lot more to an efficient text editor than that one concept...
- nickik 14y agoPsst, dont tell anybody, they are asking for money because they know a concept is not enougth and the need money to implment what you call 'a lot more'.
- slurgfest 14y agoGood, so you understand that most of the problem is not this one concept. How does the one concept justify reinventing the wheel? There are several very good editors and IDEs. What is wrong with them?
- batista 14y agoThey are just glorified text editors is what is wrong with them (to re-use your initial argument). This concept/potential implementation has more syntactic intelligence.