3 ms·
They wouldn't have to do that if Windows didn't insist on being forceful with updates even for power users, who can be trusted to decide when to update. Lately
by dotnet00 2y ago
They wouldn't have to do that if Windows didn't insist on being forceful with updates even for power users, who can be trusted to decide when to update. Lately it's not as bad since you can delay/disable forced reboots for updates for ~2 months at a time, but still it'd be far more ideal to just be able to turn off forced reboots entirely.
- bongodongobob 2y agoHi, I'm a power user too, and updates don't break anything, stop pretending it's 1998. Sincerely, every IT dept.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- a1369209993 2y ago[flagged]
- dotnet00 2y agoThe issue isn't updates breaking stuff, the issue is forced reboots when I have something open for which I don't just want the OS throwing away the state for. The IT dept. comment is pretty accurate though, just as dismissive, pointlessly snarky and disconnected from doing productive work as the real deal.
- bongodongobob 2y agoIt does that because you've ignored weeks of pop ups saying you need to update.