4 ms·
It's not so simple. Even if you pay for YouTube premium you might still want to have adblocker on simply due to privacy concerns. Tracking is pervasive. Infra
by jerojero 2y ago
It's not so simple.
Even if you pay for YouTube premium you might still want to have adblocker on simply due to privacy concerns. Tracking is pervasive.
Infrastructure might not be free, but for many, many years these companies built their hegemonic position by pretending it was free. Now they pull the rug under people.
Tell me though, what alternatives there are for people who want to watch long form videos there are? Yes, you have nebula and a couple more; but YouTube is still king. In many cases watchers don't get to choose the platform. So yes, they could simply stop watching. But it's not an ideal situation and all because you don't agree with the way the platform earns money.
I think people should use adblocker. The way these platforms monetise our data is not something most of us chose, and the option to circumvent their practices is out there. It's a cat and mouse game, and we'll see who comes out on top.
- mecsred 2y agoThose options aren't mutually exclusive though. You can use an ad blocker and pay for the service at the same time.
- AndrewDucker 2y agoI use an adblocker on YouTube. And pay for premium. No issues so far.
- legitster 2y ago> Even if you pay for YouTube premium you might still want to have adblocker on simply due to privacy concerns. I use adblockers and Youtube Premium. Youtube Premium doesn't care about adblockers. But that's still not a great argument because Youtube as a first-party is still going to collect all of your data even with adblockers. All you are doing is impacting their ability to make money.