3 ms·

> level 3 is still basically ... well yeah, that is the definition of level 3. That's not going to change. They are limited by: > Our technology relies on a

> level 3 is still basically ... well yeah, that is the definition of level 3. That's not going to change. They are limited by: > Our technology relies on a digital high-definition map that provides a 3D image of the road and the surroundings with information on road geometry, route characteristics, traffic signs and special traffic events IMHO Tesla's "F--- it all just use NN" approach does get around the pre-generated 3D map requirement. Even if it is not much more than Level 3.5 at the moment. Pretty funny to see it accelerate to 65mph in a parking lot b/c it thought it was on the nearby highway though.

jefftk 2y ago
> it is not much more than Level 3.5 at the moment It's not even level 3, and couldn't be certified as such. It's not reliable enough for the person in the driver's seat to focus their full attention elsewhere. >> level 3 is still basically lane keeping and auto cruise control > well yeah, that is the definition of level 3 No, it's the definition of level 2: https://www.sae.org/blog/sae-j3016-update https://www.sae.org/blog/sae-j3016-update ("example features: lane centering and adaptive cruise control at the same time")
- jvanderbot 2y ago
  I mean, that's very official looking. And the differentiating criteria for level 3 is "You must take over when asked" and everything 2 or below is "You must brake, steer, or accelerate as needed to ensure safety". Am I missing something? Lane keeping, cruise control and offset keeping is level 3. That's what this feature offers according to a few posts up. It makes no difference to the conversation. I'll stop poking the bear here.