Sounds good: Dual-Core Atom Processor D2700 (2.13 GHz, 2x 512KB L2 Cache) Do you know how this compares with the original eee PC 701? (Celeron M ULV 353 (512K

Sounds good: Dual-Core Atom Processor D2700 (2.13 GHz, 2x 512KB L2 Cache) Do you know how this compares with the original eee PC 701? (Celeron M ULV 353 (512K L2 Cache, 900 MHz, 400 MHz FSB), underclocked to 600MHz http://ark.intel.com/products/27157/Intel-Celeron-M-Processor-ULV-353-%28512K-Cache-900-MHz-400-MHz-FSB%29 http://ark.intel.com/products/27157/Intel-Celeron-M-Processo...) Is it just by clock rate (and # cores), or is Atom faster than Celeron M, per clock-cycle? The ARM cortex-A8, -A9, -A15 give performance of 2.0, 2.5, 3.5 DMIPS/MHz, so I'm thinking Intel might have done the same (though they probably focus on improving performance per watt). Other factors influence performance, but at least this gives some idea.