4 ms·

Your post had no content. It made a bald assertion that ignored what had been said before. I would genuinely like it if you posted some actual content, and I ho

by qqq 18y ago

Your post had no content. It made a bald assertion that ignored what had been said before. I would genuinely like it if you posted some actual content, and I hoped to indirectly encourage you in that direction. The tone is from a book I've been reading today (The Diamond Age).

gruseom 18y ago
Your post had no content. [...] I would genuinely like it if you posted some actual content, and I hoped to indirectly encourage you Heh. Something about this comment seemed very familiar to me, and after a while I figured out what it was: the distinctive sound of xlnt aka curi. Yay web history! While I have an enduring if inexplicable affection for you, and get that you weren't being sarcastic, the last thing I want to do is have an argument about Wittgenstein together :)
- qqq 18y ago
  ok. hey i don't seem to have written anything in my profile. how'd u figure that out?
  - rms 18y ago
    you submitted entries from your blog
    - gruseom 18y ago
      Ah. That would have been the easy way. I figured it out because xlnt stopped commenting on the same day that qqq started. Edit: Besides, there can't be that many people who go on about Godwin, Burke, and Feynman.
      - qqq 18y ago
        There should be :(
        gruseom 18y ago
        Well, to cheer you up let's talk about Godwin. I read Caleb Williams years ago. It was great - like an 18th century anarchist version of Enemy of the State!