3 ms·
But we are not all unibombers. Any security/privacy discussion starts with the level of threat. The average person doesn't want to hide their every detail, nor
by sandworm101 2y ago
But we are not all unibombers. Any security/privacy discussion starts with the level of threat. The average person doesn't want to hide their every detail, nor do they have to. The average person probably wants something like "I don't want my government to passively scan what I read online". That's an easy hurdle. Or, "my brother is addicted to cocaine and I want to talk to him about it without AT&T reporting our conversation the police." Again, this is easy. But if you say "I'm a defense contractor currently under investigation for treason and want to I pass money/information to my handler in North Korea undetected." THAT would be a challenge. It is probably still doable, but we should not abandon the basic needs of most people simply because we cannot promise total privacy to the most difficult cases too.
(Fyi, I once talked to a defense attorney representing alleged terrorists. His clients lived overseas and the attorney was representing them in the US. That man was one of those hard privacy cases.)
- rustcleaner 2y agoIf you know what you're doing it's easy. The hard part is getting from nascent to knowing what to do without inadvertently tripping wires in the process. The surveillance has a major component built around how people behave normally in normie society (specifically, communication and technology habits).
- rangestransform 2y agoThat's why it's important that software and hardware companies ship security that's secure against nation state actors by default, so that those who actually need it can blend into the masses