3 ms·
In many countries you even can't claim copyright for the output of the AI to use license like this.
by nicce 2y ago
In many countries you even can't claim copyright for the output of the AI to use license like this.
- hannasanarion 2y agoCopyright on the software that produces something isn't the same as copyright on the output. The library's copyright is intact, as normal, and they can control who uses it and how just like any other software. The output of AI systems is not copyrightable, but the systems themselves are, and associated EULAs are valid.
- nicce 2y agoIs that so certain? To be able to make claims for what you can use the output, can you do it without making any claims for about control and ownership of the output? Of course, they can revoke your right to use the software, but if it goes to court, that would be interesting case.
- wrs 2y agoIf there’s no copyright in the weights to begin with, the only restrictions you have are the ones you agreed to when you accepted the license agreement. Find the weights somewhere else and you don’t have to worry about the license. I don’t know why there isn’t more discussion on this point and people just assume there’s an underlying copyright basis to the licensing of weights. As far as I know that isn’t settled at all.
- wakawaka28 2y agoI'd like to know how they think they'll prove I didn't write whatever code I generate. Unless it is a direct copy of something else available to the investigator, good luck.
- numpad0 2y agoI think it's not important if this is enforcable, this license sounds to me like a warning that the output may be radioactive, which is where AI copyright discussions are slowly shifting towards.