16 ms·

The fact that I think it's wrong for the public to be able to trivially track anyone? I think the capacity is a bad thing. I also think it would be bad as I sta

The fact that I think it's wrong for the public to be able to trivially track anyone? I think the capacity is a bad thing. I also think it would be bad as I stated if the public could trivially track poor people. I thought I made that pretty clear in my comment. I don't understand what it is you're asking evidence for. It's clearly a thing that can be done, this the existence is this bill. And I'm making an argument that morally that is wrong. You're free to disagree with my moral judgment, and I'm sure many people do, but it's not really a thing that requires evidence.

n4r9 2y ago
What do you think are the negative consequences of private flight data being publicly available?
cess11 2y ago
"The fact that I think it's wrong for the public to be able to trivially track anyone?" It's not "anyone", it's people with a lot of social and economic power, that through their means of transportation does a lot more damage to society and our habitat than most people that get sentenced for a crime in the courts. If it gets public that you smoked some weed or did some oxy without a physician signing off on it then it should obviously be public that you are rich, and that you refuse to mingle with the plebs and instead fart out tons and tons of carbon dioxide.
salawat 2y ago
>The fact that I think it's wrong for the public to be able to trivially track anyone? Does that extend to preventing private individuals, well heeled individuals being able to sic private investigators on whoever they like, or the government trivially tracking someone? Because if it doesn't, I find your POV repulsive. There can be no reciprocal equality if you specifically orchestrate the blinding of the public to the comings and goings of those in power.