3 ms·
Knowing the training data GH has I doubt it's comparable, then again I don't have the benchmarks
by ramon156 2y ago
Knowing the training data GH has I doubt it's comparable, then again I don't have the benchmarks
- ramon156 2y agoAfter typing this I tried the live chat out and it honestly seems a lot more promising than current GH Copilot, very nice!
- ssgodderidge 2y agoAre you saying GH has more than Codestral and therefore GH has a better model? Or that Codestral would be better because Codestral is not littered with "bad" code?
- nkozyra 2y agoBad code is obviously very subjective, but I would wager that GH places a much higher value on feedback mechanisms like stars, issues, PRs, velocity, etc. Their ubiquity likely allows them to automatically cherry-pick less "bad code."
- nicce 2y agoNothing prevents Mistral do the same if they want to. Issues and and PRs are public information, exposed by APIs, and not that much rate limited.