3 ms·
If anything, Kagi has proven that Googles "SEO ruined it" argument isn't valid. In the beginning, Kagi was mostly just API calls to Google and Bing AFAIK. Thei
by eitland 2y ago
If anything, Kagi has proven that Googles "SEO ruined it" argument isn't valid.
In the beginning, Kagi was mostly just API calls to Google and Bing AFAIK. Their results were still better for some reason, probably because they didn't have to consider how valuable the ads on garbage site were before throwing the site out of my results.
- spacebanana7 2y agoI agree with you to some extent. For example, there's no reason I can think of why Google couldn't allow user selected domain blacklisting or custom bangs. But I fear that if a large search engine copied some of Kagi's filters/lenses for non-commercial blogs & forums then SEO agencies would dedicate immense resources to polluting them.
- freediver 2y agoSmall Web is non commercial sites only, by definition. And the list of included sites is manually curated. There is nothing SEO can do to infiltrate it.