3 ms·
This isn't your issue though. A group chooses to talk in an environment where they can barely hear each other. Rather than using a device for it, I'd recommend
by wruza 2y ago
This isn't your issue though. A group chooses to talk in an environment where they can barely hear each other. Rather than using a device for it, I'd recommend to perceive the problem as it is and solve it in a conventional way. E.g. by saying "I couldn't hear shit, and you too probably. That's stupid, let's go <goodplacename> instead" unless it's hard to do. Generally these places are designed for you to suffer unless you're screaming all the time and are indifferent to surroundings. I don't get why people go there and leave money, cause I wouldn't go there even for that money. You don't want an AI device that replaces respect for each others limits.
- ghaff 2y agoIt's sort of inevitable in crowded situations. My main objection is when there's also loud music when that really isn't the purpose of the gathering.
- pavel_lishin 2y agoIt's certainly their issue if they want to continue spending time with the group doing what most of the group prefers. > I don't get why people go there and leave money, cause I wouldn't go there even for that money. That's a problem with lack of empathy and understanding on your part, not with the group dynanimcs of that person's friends.
- drewg123 2y agoYou don't always have a choice. Sometimes there are loud places where you just have to be (airports, train stations, etc). My most frustrating time is transiting airports with my wife, who is a very quiet talker.