3 ms·
Something tells me one of you is speaking about fiction and one of you is speaking about nonfiction. Inflection, emotion, tone, character-specific affects and
by sjsdaiuasgdia 2y ago
Something tells me one of you is speaking about fiction and one of you is speaking about nonfiction.
Inflection, emotion, tone, character-specific affects and all that can really change the audiobook experience for fiction. Your mentioning of footnote references and GNU suggests you're talking about nonfiction, perhaps technical books. For that, a voice that never significantly changes is fine and maybe even a good thing. For fiction it'd be a big step down from a professional human reader who understands the story and the characters' mental states.
- Rodeoclash 2y agoAgreed. In fact a great example of this is the Blood Meridian audio book where each of the characters seems to get a distinct "voice" despite being narrated by a single person. You can find it on YouTube easily if you want an example.
- dececco 2y agoI'm talking about both. I cannot listen to audiobooks that are acted, in fact, that was the reason I decided to go down the rabbit hole of creating my own. > For fiction it'd be a big step down from a professional human reader who understands the story and the characters' mental states. On the contrary, I don't want the reader to understand anything, I just want the text in audio form and I will do the interpretation of it myself.
- sjsdaiuasgdia 2y agoshrug good for you. A lot of people including myself find audiobook fiction really hard to listen to if read with a flat automated voice. I think how you tend to listen might also matter. I mostly use audiobooks when I'm driving or otherwise doing something else that is going to claim a portion of my attention. Following the narrative and dialog is easier when the audio provides cues like vocal tone changes for each speaker / narrator.