> things that were once widely accepted (e.g., office politics) are now barely tolerated, if they are accepted at all. I’d argue that the fact that the author

> things that were once widely accepted (e.g., office politics) are now barely tolerated, if they are accepted at all. I’d argue that the fact that the author thinks that “office politics” have somehow disappeared is a reason to discredit anything the author might have to say wrt work altogether. It’s possibly true that with WFH the “politics” people have become much more adept at hiding the fact that they’re playing “office” politics, especially from those, who apparently like the author seem unaware of what’s actually going on at work, but the actual “office politics” has only grown significantly. It’s just more insidious now and the outcomes are not visible until much later.