Based on your reply here, I think we have different definition of AGI/ASI. AGI = Can do anything any human can. ASI = AGI has iterated on itself, creating a v

Based on your reply here, I think we have different definition of AGI/ASI. AGI = Can do anything any human can. ASI = AGI has iterated on itself, creating a version of AI that is better than any humans could do together. > I don't even think anyone has proven that an LLM can make one unsupervised. Is unrelated because current LLMs are not AGI or ASI. > Unlikely to infeasible; if you've spent enough time on Shodan it becomes quickly apparent there is not much meaningfully powerful unsecured compute. I would only concede that meaningful compute can be bought. Depends on what you mean by "meaningful". Initially just one box would be enough for escaping. The idea would be to get away from the initial, original box, to perform suspicious actions unnoticed. It should be possible to get at least some compute even without hacking a box, but just using some random SaaS providers that will allow a trial user for whatever reason to execute arbitrary code in a sandbox environment (but still connected to the Internet). > which I have never seen AI create Because currently there's no AGI/ASI. If you have to imagine ASI, it would be you take a group of 1,000 most performant people in various categories in the World. Then you add the ability to take their mental capacity, but make it 100x faster. E.g. what it would take one person to solve 100h, it would take 1h for the AI. Then in addition to that you make all of it clonable. So if we have the 1000 geniuses, you will be able to make them 10,000,000 where each is dealing with different things. That's ASI. I don't have more time right now to write the full response, but the main thing is, we need to align on definition of AGI and ASI.