3 ms·
Assuming Helen's account is fully accurate, of course. The same person who was pushed out after her coup attempt failed. Which was very likely motivated by muc
by dmix 2y ago
Assuming Helen's account is fully accurate, of course.
The same person who was pushed out after her coup attempt failed. Which was very likely motivated by much more than Sam lying as she has stated in other articles about how she wants AI she regulated by gov, how GPT shouldn't have been released to the public because it's dangerous, and her interim CEO she pushed as Sams temporary replacement who made statements about wanting to pause AI development for safety reasons.
- wyldfire 2y ago> pushed out If what she said was true, I'd leave the board if I were in her position. I would understand why they decided to take him back but decide that it's not worth working with someone who can't be trusted.
- FireBeyond 2y ago> Sam lying as she has stated in other articles about how she wants AI she regulated by gov Hell, Sam wants AI regulated by government... ... after OAI is well-established and locked in, of course. A little ladder-pulling and regulatory capture is something he's entirely aligned upon.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Terr_ 2y ago> A little ladder-pulling and regulatory capture is something he's entirely aligned upon. I'd say it should be the default-expectation for anybody operating as a professional Venture Capitalist these days, and AFAIK there's no personal record to indicate otherwise.
- cjbprime 2y agoPeople are always pushed out after a failed coup attempt. It signifies the end of a working trust relationship. The fact that they were pushed out afterwards does not provide evidence for whether their reasons were good ones.