If you "understand why someone might not understand," then I don't get how you could also believe someone with an incorrect understanding "is not going to be co

If you "understand why someone might not understand," then I don't get how you could also believe someone with an incorrect understanding "is not going to be convinced by anything" or, even worse, is "not a person worth convincing of anything." Your response to conspiracy theorists is to place the burden of proof on them and then ignore them since your understanding transcends theirs? That may work for you as an individual, but on a macro scale, it seems defeatist, and also unhelpful to all sides (since you're neither convincing them to give up unfounded theories, nor increasing safety against actual conspiracies for yourself).