Guess when you zoom in very closely to something, a lot of differences appear, and when you zoom out, somethings look similar. If you step back and just take i

Guess when you zoom in very closely to something, a lot of differences appear, and when you zoom out, somethings look similar. If you step back and just take it as comparing the functional programming concepts in both F# and Rust, then it seemed like a valuable comparison. Just because how they get compiled is different and that they started with different goals, doesn't change how they are similar in programming style. Not sure why making that comparison is invalid. And. Not sure even your fundamental objections are true anymore. Rust can be compiled to WASM, and F# can be compiled to WASM, does that mean Rust is no longer just for systems programming? Why make such a strong stance, if it isn't a 'system level' then you can't use Rust or compare it to anything else. "you better just use it for system level stuff or else". All in all, it does seem like you need to take a chill pill. Rust isn't what it used to be, it can be something beyond systems programming.