4 ms·
It's a heated race with HL3. Duke Nukem Forever took 14 years, so I wouldn't call this dead quite yet.
by RGamma 2y ago
It's a heated race with HL3. Duke Nukem Forever took 14 years, so I wouldn't call this dead quite yet.
- jcranmer 2y agoTo be fair to Valve, all the evidence I've seen so far as indicated that Valve hasn't been actively developing HL3 for several years (https://www.ign.com/articles/half-life-3-left-4-dead-3-details-cancelled-valve https://www.ign.com/articles/half-life-3-left-4-dead-3-detai... claims it was canceled by 2014), whereas Duke Nukem Forever and Star Citizen have been in active development for well over a decade.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- zaptrem 2y agoWe also got Half Life Alyx which IMO lived up to the 3 hype with the exception of concluding the original story.
- mey 2y agoAnd Valve has released Episode 1, 2, and Alyx since HL2.
- RGamma 2y agoWell, that makes me sort of sad. Now we'll never get to know who G-Man is (wink wink).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- jakubmazanec 2y agoBut is Half-life 3 even being developed?
- barryrandall 2y agoWhy would they waste time making their own games when they can make more distributing other people's games?
- jakubmazanec 2y agoBut Half-life is IMO one of the top gaming franchises. And after seeing Fallout adaptation, I think Half-life TV series would also be successful if properly made.