4 ms·

>You mean like the oil lobby that tries to deny or downplay the consequences of climate change because they don't want to lose their profits and can afford to d

>You mean like the oil lobby that tries to deny or downplay the consequences of climate change because they don't want to lose their profits and can afford to deal with the consequences. Yeah exactly. Hard to imagine that only exists on one side of the isle... >They talk about but that's more expensive, takes more time, and partially even needs technology that doesn't exist yet. So you're saying what we're doing now is not going to help and the things we really need don't exist yet? >I'm so tired of people destroying our future because they don't want to change anything, I don't even know where to start. I'm so tired of people making assumptions, insinuating things that have never been said. Exactly the kind of bad faith acting that I mentioned before. >Morituri te salutant. Thanks for proving my points.

croes 2y ago
>Yeah exactly. Hard to imagine that only exists on one side of the isle. But only one side a the majority of scientists on its side >So you're saying what we're doing now is not going to help and the things we really need don't exist yet? No, I say that some technologies we need to deal with the consequences don't exist yet. The technology to prevent it already exists, we are just late in using it. >I'm so tired of people making assumptions, insinuating things that have never been said. Exactly the kind of bad faith acting that I mentioned before. How ironic because you did the same the sentence before. >Thanks for proving my points. Thanks for proving your narrow view. People in the world already die from climate change consequences but I think they don't count.
- Grimeton 2y ago
  >But only one side a the majority of scientists on its side Looking at what "science" is supposed to be nowadays I have my doubts. Looks more like there are a lot of people that all say the same thing because out of fear of loosing their jobs. > How ironic because you did the same the sentence before. Glad you noticed it.

croes 2y ago

>Yeah exactly. Hard to imagine that only exists on one side of the isle. But only one side a the majority of scientists on its side >So you're saying what we're doing now is not going to help and the things we really need don't exist yet? No, I say that some technologies we need to deal with the consequences don't exist yet. The technology to prevent it already exists, we are just late in using it. >I'm so tired of people making assumptions, insinuating things that have never been said. Exactly the kind of bad faith acting that I mentioned before. How ironic because you did the same the sentence before. >Thanks for proving my points. Thanks for proving your narrow view. People in the world already die from climate change consequences but I think they don't count.

Grimeton 2y ago
>But only one side a the majority of scientists on its side Looking at what "science" is supposed to be nowadays I have my doubts. Looks more like there are a lot of people that all say the same thing because out of fear of loosing their jobs. > How ironic because you did the same the sentence before. Glad you noticed it.