Interesting choice of name. Aside from the controversial nature of the subject, my immediate association is "not as good as what Plan A should've been". But th

Interesting choice of name. Aside from the controversial nature of the subject, my immediate association is "not as good as what Plan A should've been". But the biggest thing for me is the lack of screenshots. This is text-heavy, and the text is pretty generic. For example: > "Our project management SaaS stands out due to its emphasis on simplicity and structured configurations. Unlike numerous tools offering extensive customization options, we've prioritized key functionalities crucial for effective project management. This deliberate approach ensures a user-friendly experience while adhering to best practices. We aim to provide a streamlined, focused platform that simplifies project management processes, enabling teams to concentrate on tasks rather than getting lost in intricate configurations." > "Dynamic Project Management: Plan B cuts through the chaos with intuitive project planning, real-time tracking, and seamless integration of all your resources. It's about bringing clarity and calm to the storm." Okay. I'm sure JIRA and Asana also "aim to provide a streamlined, focused platform that simplifies project management processes, enabling teams to concentrate on tasks rather than getting lost in intricate configurations." That's a lot of promises - which of these features have you implemented? Show me, don't just tell me what everyone else is also saying. Nobody sets out to build a convoluted, distracting project management tool. Despite this, I logged in, and you actually have a working product, which is awesome! I think you should really showcase the most crucial features with screenshots and gifs instead of droning on and on about your philosophy. Finally, and this is a smaller thing, but the landing page is sloppy. The headings are blurred out on the right. One of the subtitles is latin placeholder text ("Quis tellus eget adipiscing...")