3 ms·
To be fair, it does read like "Work at MSFT and [therefore] don't have a choice in the matter." It's not an institutional policy (MS owns github after all), so
by jayknight 2y ago
To be fair, it does read like "Work at MSFT and [therefore] don't have a choice in the matter."
It's not an institutional policy (MS owns github after all), so it would have been more clear to say
"Work on a team that uses ADO and don't have a choice in the matter."
- DiggyJohnson 2y agoI take your point. Yes, I do agree that would be clearer. Just to restate my position for anyone else reading, I don't believe that the fact that a point could be restated with more clarity means that the original version is misleading. Everything, everywhere, always could always be made better than it is. The question is not "could this be made better?" but instead "is this clear enough [to avoid accusations of misinformation]?"