3 ms·
> I wouldn’t support this bill if TikTok.com were going to be blocked Do we have anything other than "it wasn't explicitly called out in the bill" to back this
by falcolas 2y ago
> I wouldn’t support this bill if TikTok.com were going to be blocked
Do we have anything other than "it wasn't explicitly called out in the bill" to back this up? There are a lot of catchall clauses built into the bill which could easily cover the website as well.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Do we have anything other than "it wasn't explicitly called out in the bill" to back this up The specificity of the enforcement language, the First Amendment, how Trump’s attempts floundered, et cetera. The closest thing that could happen is the domain is seized and it winds up behind TikTok.cn.
- falcolas 2y ago> The specificity of the enforcement language, the First Amendment, how Trump’s attempts floundered, et cetera All of which can be argued for the app as well. Frankly, I'd want something a bit more specific. Especially since the government has used vague laws and language to quite effectively nuke specific websites before. The thing that could happen is TikTok being findable only at 205.251.194.210 or its ipv6 equivalent.