4 ms·

No evidence in the article that Altman knew about this, and intentionally clickbaity and misleading title. Quoting: "there are only two plausible reasons for A

• benterix 2y ago
  You are technically true. However, if you sign contracts you haven't read, you would have a hard time defending your innocence in court. This applies even more for higher positions like CEO.
  • _cs2017_ 2y ago
    Yes, legally responsible. There's no legal violation here, though. The article made a specific claim: that Altman was aware of something. It provided no evidence that he was. If it accused him of some criminal misdeed, then it wouldn't matter if he was aware of it, as long as he signed the illegal order. That would be a different story, but clearly in this case it doesn't apply.
• DemocracyFTW2 2y ago
  > No evidence was offered that he read the contracts This excuse only works for people who do not get paid for doing exactly this: the power to sign contracts, exit papers, stuff like that on behalf of the company, and, therefore, be aware of their contents. "I didn't go through the contract before agreeing to its content by signing it" is a damning verdict for someone in this position. You don't have to prove he read it: he signed, therefore he's responsible.
  • _cs2017_ 2y ago
    I didn't say anything about responsibility. The article has a title and it's intentionally misleading.