3 ms·
If they used bridges instead of intersections where the roads cross over each other there would be no need for traffic lights and it would further reduce the ch
by graybeardhacker 2y ago
If they used bridges instead of intersections where the roads cross over each other there would be no need for traffic lights and it would further reduce the chance of someone driving into oncoming traffic. The bridges could run on top of each other and further reduce the area needed for the interchange.
I'm sure bridges are more expensive than roads but it seems the obvious choice versus stopping four lanes of traffic at a light.
- desert_rue 2y agoThat only makes sense if both sets of traffic don’t interact. Most bridges over highways that have off-ramp traffic have traffic lights.
- throw1230 2y agoThat is called a stack interchange, it's much larger and much more expensive to build and have no peds or bike access.