4 ms·
> Sounds like IPv7, from year 1993: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1475 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1475 The author(s) of IPv7 (TP/IX) '
by throw0101d 2y ago
> Sounds like IPv7, from year 1993: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1475 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1475
The author(s) of IPv7 (TP/IX) 'abandoned' / altered it to CATNIP:
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1707 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1707
This was put up for consideration for IPng, and compared with TUBA and SIPP:
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1752 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1752
The general idea of SIPP(-16) was chosen (and tweaked) to be IPng, now called IPv6.
The criteria needed for IPng candidates were:
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1726 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1726