3 ms·

Source for culture without green: https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/its-not-easy-seeing-green/ https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfl

by rolisz 2y ago

Source for culture without green: https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/its-not-easy-seeing-green/ https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/... And I agree with you on the second part: everyone agrees the sky is blue and that grass is green. But the fuzzy edges are what kills it and I don't think you can define it rigorously except by drawing some arbitrary lines on the color wheel. Which will be just that: arbitrary

lisper 2y ago
> But the fuzzy edges are what kills it Why? Everything has fuzzy edges. If you think fuzzy edges are fatal you won't be able to communicate about anything in the real world. Thanks for the reference, but it's not really what you claimed. It's not that they don't have a word for "green", it's that they don't have separate words for "green" and "blue", so they use the same word for both. That is not quite the same as not having a word for "green". You can see the same phenomenon in English. We have separate words for "orange" and "brown" even though they are actually the same hue just with different luminosities. Brown is just a dark orange.