The strategic purpose of this particular installment was to preemptively inoculate against ontological arguments for God, i.e. the argument that God is the sour

The strategic purpose of this particular installment was to preemptively inoculate against ontological arguments for God, i.e. the argument that God is the source of logical and mathematical truth. But I didn't want to actually come out and say that explicitly at this early stage. I'm intentionally avoiding any overt mention of religion at this point. Does that answer your question?