3 ms·
> They are 10x smaller than CSV. So 600GB instead of 6TB. how? lossless compression? under what scenario? vague headlines like this just beg more questions
by swyx 2y ago
> They are 10x smaller than CSV. So 600GB instead of 6TB.
how? lossless compression? under what scenario?
vague headlines like this just beg more questions
- riku_iki 2y agoLikely this assumes that parquet has internal compression applied, and CSV is uncompressed.