2 ms·
>So, nope, that's not an adequate argument. I'm not trying to argue, lol. You're asking for more information but in such a weirdly aggressive way. The reason
by ziddoap 2y ago
>So, nope, that's not an adequate argument.
I'm not trying to argue, lol. You're asking for more information but in such a weirdly aggressive way.
The reason there is a soft limit (in our current theories) is because of the cosmological principle
Big lol at the wiki linking of burden of proof. Not every conversation is an argument, holy.
As much as I love HN, this type of aggressiveness and desire to converse as if defending a dissertation can get bloody exhausting.
- moralestapia 2y ago>The reason there is a soft limit (in our current theories) is because of the cosmological principle What? That's a circular argument. HN is definitely not the place for "me vs. you" grudges, so I stick to making arguments and try to drive the conversation forward, however, >Have fun! It's quite interesting. >Unless your goal is to argue, instead of learn, [...] >Big lol at the wiki linking of burden of proof. You don't seem to be the one arguing in good faith, though. "You're being aggressive", laughable.
- ziddoap 2y agoMy "Have fun!" was genuine, I had a lot of fun learning about this stuff despite not pursuing a PhD in cosmology. Anton Petrov covers this specific topic in a few videos, as well as other large structures, and it's truly fascinating. The rest was probably a bit uncalled for, you're right. I was immediately put on edge by "Yeah, read the site guidelines, yo." (which, uhh, not sure how that is focused on moving the conversation forward but lets leave it at we were both touchy!)