The sarcasm made an already shaky point even worse. There's a huge difference in magnitude here (writing a note vs. screen grabbing everything you ever do on t

The sarcasm made an already shaky point even worse. There's a huge difference in magnitude here (writing a note vs. screen grabbing everything you ever do on the computer), and also a difference of awareness (intently recording one moment in time with a photo vs. almost unconsciously being recorded all the time even if you enabled it). These simplistic fallacies are the result of very superficial assessments. Either an apparently small mistake leads to a wildly wrong conclusion (being overheard once is the same as being overheard all the time, because overheard is overheard), or everything is justifiable in small increments so you just loop through them as many times as it takes to get to a wildly unacceptable result (if one photo is ok, then two photos are ok, and just iterate it until you get 30 photos per second of constant video surveillance, you just said you're fine with one more photo). Bottom line being you won't get anything of value out of such a conversation. I know I don't.